Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
a hundred and one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject: Appeal At times it can be convenient for any Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to help make an attempt to dispose of a case on benefit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got reached to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it has reached such stage. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, even though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it is actually actually rather imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held towards the ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Offered the legal analysis on the subject issue, we've been from the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be topic to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case of your petitioners for promotion might be viewed as, however, we're apparent in our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, issue to availability of vacancy topic into the approval on the competent authority.
record with the department there isn't any record readily available whatsoever regarding promotion with the petitioner(Promotion)
Please use one username and password established from the options. If it does not work please test here the other. Each and every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have concluded your session in Manupatra.
Free case legislation sites in Pakistan are priceless resources for anybody needing to understand Pakistani law. By making use of the guidelines and techniques outlined in this article, you could navigate these resources effectively and conduct complete legal research.
forty eight . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A will not be obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are some of the relevant factors. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners failed a qualifying exam, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based on the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances on the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 of your Constitution. Read more
Even though many websites offer free case regulation, not all are equally reliable. It’s critical To judge the credibility with the source before relying on the information.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight offered to any reported judgment may perhaps rely upon the reputation of both the reporter and also the judges.[7]
this Court is remaining with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)
13309-B of 2010 for being weak types of evidence and also the evidentiary value whereof would be noticed on the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody with the petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to be suit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)